National governments are required to disarm their own citizens so that there can be no Armed Resistance to the world government at that level.

Despite denials by bureaucrats, plans to disarm Australians were well under way before the Port Arthur massacre. In 1983 the federal government signed the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women. One of the articles in the preamble of that Convention states: "Affirming that .... general and complete disarmament .... will to the attainment of full equality between men and women." That meant disarmament. To implement that Convention in Australia the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 was passed, and the Preamble to the Anti-discrimination  Convention appended to it as a Schedule.

Before Australians could be disarmed, some event of major impact had to happen to justify it. On the afternoon of 28 April 1996, a shooter entered the Broadarrow Cafe, Port Arthur  Tasmania. According to the book `Deadly Deception at Port Arthur' by Vialls, the shooter shot 32 people with a high powered assault rifle which he fired from the right hip at approximately one second intervals. In the space of a couple of minutes with 29 shots, he shot 32 people, killing 20 people and wounding 12 - a killing to injured ratio of almost 2 to 1 - exceptional by all standards. What Australians weren’t told is that all but one of those killed (19 out of 20) were killed with single: shots to the head. Only a highly skilled counter-terrorist shooter could achieve such a result.

The man serving life for the massacre is Martin Bryant, a left-handed, intellectually impaired, registered invalid with no training in the use of high powered weapons. According to military experts (including Brigadier Ted Sarong) it is - impossible for Bryant to have done it. People in the government know it, people in the Judiciary know it, and so do people in the media who assisted in the cover-up. Bryant is safely locked away, denied visits even by his mother. Records of the proceedings have been sealed for 30 years.

The first round of gun confiscations - the so-called gun `buyback scheme' – a phrase carefully chosen to imply that the guns came from the government in the first place followed the Port Arthur massacre. Since then, gun-related crime has increased (as predicted), and that fact will now be used as the pretext for removing the rest of the guns from the law-abiding community. Alternatively, another mass shooting will occur, this time possibly in a school. Patriots and nationalists opposed to the globalisation of their country, not gun-toting criminals, are the real target of civilian disarmament.