Creating a European Indigenous People’s Movement
| AR Articles on Europe |
|---|
| Prospects for our Movement (Feb. 27, 2004) |
| Europe on the March (Jun. 2002) |
| Can Europe Learn the Lessons of Yugoslavia? (Sep. 2001) |
| Germany: Islamic Gangrene (Nov. 1999) |
| Race in Scandanavia (Dec. 2003) |
| Search AmRen.com for Europe |
| More news stories on Europe |
An American friend of mine has proposed that native Europeans should create a European Indigenous People’s Movement. I have hesitated with supporting this because it sounded a bit too extreme. However, in more and more European cities, the native population is being pushed out of their own neighborhoods by immigrant gangs. The natives receive little or no aid from their authorities, sometimes blatant hostility, when faced with immigrant violence. In an age where the global population increases with billions of people in a few decades, it is entirely plausible, indeed likely, that the West could soon become demographically overwhelmed. Not few of our intellectuals seem to derive pleasure from this thought.
Bat Ye’or in her book about Eurabia has documented how the European Union is actively allowing Muslims to colonize European countries. The next time EU leaders complain about China’s treatment of minorities, I suggest the Chinese answer the following: “Yes, we represent an anti-democratic organization dedicated to subduing the indigenous people of Tibet, but you represent an anti-democratic organization dedicated to displacing the indigenous peoples of an entire continent.” There is no love lost between me and the Chinese Communist Party, an organization responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of its citizens, but even Chinese authorities do not actively seek to displace their own people with violent Muslims. European authorities do.
In decadent societies of the past, the authorities didn’t open the gates to hostile nations and ban opposition to this as intolerance and barbarophobia. What we are dealing with in the modern West is not merely decadence; it’s one of the greatest betrayals in history. Our so-called leaders pass laws banning the opposition to our dispossession as “racism and hate speech.” To native Europeans, when listening to our media and our leaders, it’s as if we don’t even exist, as if it were normal for them to put the interests of other nations over their own. Despite having “democratic” governments, many Western countries have authorities that are more hostile to their own people than dictators in some developing countries. Why?
At the Daily Telegraph, Simon Heffer suggests that the mass immigration encouraged in particular by the Labour governments of Blair and Brown in Britain is not happening out of incompetence, but is part of “a doctrinally driven determination by the new Government in 1997 to destroy our national identity and to advance multiculturalism.” I agree, but this policy of state-sponsored population replacement is far from limited to Britain.
Numbers discussed in 2008 showed clearly that mass immigration has had no positive effects on the economy in Britain, and I have seen similar calculations from France, Denmark and Norway, among others. On the contrary, it is a drain on the finances of the native population, and that’s even if we don’t count the wave of terrorism, insecurity and street violence which is sweeping Western Europe, from Sweden via Germany to the Netherlands. On top of this, the costs of destruction of national cohesion and weakened cultural legacies are incalculable, yet mass immigration continues as if nothing has happened. In April 2008, a report indicated that Spain needed over two million new foreign workers just until 2020, many of whom are likely to come from Muslim North Africa. The authors of the report would call upon the Spanish government to adopt a new law on immigration “to facilitate the legal entry, take advantage of the new arrivals and encourage integration.”
I have earlier toyed with the idea of giving native Norwegians the legal status as indigenous people in Norway. A large proportion of my ancestors have lived here since the end of the last Ice Age, for as long as this country has been habitable for humans. The original settlers, who came from Central Europe (Germany and the Czech Republic), have been supplemented by other Europeans. Genetic traces from peoples of Near Eastern origins who spread agriculture to Europe are detectable, but until recently most Europeans were overwhelmingly the descendants of men and women who had lived in the region for tens of thousands of years.
Genetically speaking, native Europeans have thus lived longer on the same continent than have Native Americans. Many Southeast Asians are descendants of southern Chinese settlers who displaced or eradicated the original, dark-skinned inhabitants of the region in early historical times, just as many of the nations of sub-Saharan Africa are Bantu invaders who displaced or eradicated the indigenous Khoi-San peoples throughout much of Africa. Modern-day Japanese have lived in Japan for a shorter period of time than Europeans have lived in Europe. Yet a Scottish councillor, Sandy Aitchison, was chastised for using the term “indigenous” about native Brits. Why is it considered ridiculous or evil if Europeans assert our rights? Is it because we are white? Everybody’s supposed to keep their culture, except people of European origins? Is that it? Why is colonialism bad, except when my country, which has no colonial history, gets colonized by Third World peoples?
Western Europeans have in recent years accepted more immigration in a shorter period of time than any society has ever done peacefully in human history. If we want a break we have the right to do so. What we are dealing with is not “immigration” but colonization, and in the case of Muslims, internationally organized attempts to conquer of our countries. If non-Europeans have the right to resist colonization then so do Europeans. Switzerland, Sweden, Finland and Norway hardly have any colonial history at all. The Germans had a colony in Namibia. Why should they accept millions of Turkish Muslims, who have a thousand years of brutal colonial history of their own, because of this? There are hardly any Britons in Pakistan today, so why should the Brits allow huge numbers of Pakistanis to settle in Britain? And if the Algerians can demand independence from France, why can’t the French demand independence from Algerians?
(Posted on April 7, 2008)
Comments
The Russians already have an indeginous people movement. Look at them as a model.
Posted by Howard in Las Vegas at 6:53 PM on April 7
“Why is it considered ridiculous or evil if Europeans assert our rights?
Is it because we are white?”
Yes, it’s because we are white. No other group would put up with kind of nonsense.
“If people in Cameroon or Cambodia can keep their culture, why can’t the
peoples who produced Beethoven, Newton, Copernicus, Michelangelo and Louis
Pasteur do the same?”
See above.
“The most basic instinct of all living things, even down to bacteria
level, is self-preservation.”
This is correct — which makes Multicultists and Diversitards dumber than bacteria.
Thank you, Mr. Taylor, for posting yet another excellent article that I
probably would not otherwise have seen.
Posted by The Incredible Shrinking White Man at 6:59 PM on April 7
The behavior of Europe’s elite is totally bizarre.
At first I thought that they were just using the Muslims to further their plans for a European Superstate (something I’m all for).
To help break down the linguistic, cultural and ethnic differences between Europeans.
But they have now gone way past the point of no return for this to be the case.
Posted by Scotty at 7:17 PM on April 7
For simply suggesting that I would not enjoy being turned into a persecuted minority in my own country, I have been accused of being a “white nationalist,” which says a great deal about how demonized people of European ancestry have become.
I love Fjordman’s articles, and I think he is a great writer, but as he himself admits, he has come to his view a little slowly and a little late.
It’s fine for Fjordman to propose a “European Indigenous People’s Movement” and I think if that is what he wants to do, then he should.
But, frankly, I really don’t see anything wrong with being a white nationalist, and I wonder at the tone of indignation he seems to express at having been so accused.
The best part of the article is the repeated use of the phrase “We reject out of hand”. It seems to me that this is the key to giving up the feeling of having to justify one’s existence and simply to rebel against anything or anyone who threatens that existence.
One shouldn’t have to justify one’s life.
And … anyone who thinks you should have to justify being a living white human being deserves what I euphemistically call “ballistic psychotherapy” delivered with a small-caliber handgun to the back of his head …
Posted by at 7:58 PM on April 7
Yes. If only these words are heeded in time.
Posted by at 8:10 PM on April 7
As a North American of all European ancestry, how do I join and/or support this movement?
Posted by Whiteplight at 9:11 PM on April 7
“So why on earth should we quietly watch while our country is subdued by the most unsuccessful cultures in the world.”
Precisely! It’s totally unnatural and utterly perverse to sit on the sidelines and watch while one’s own leaders collude with imported enemy outgroups to commit mass genocide against their own racial kin.
Perhaps, ‘consumed from within’ by the most unsuccessful cultures in the world would be nearer the point.
Someone once said that Communism was never compelled to stand trial on charges of mass genocide and cultural destruction in the same manner Nazism was immediately after WW11.
Until the present Marxist hierarchy throughout the West are
collectively made to do just that and account for their crimes against
humanity and where found guilty, to pay for their crimes with their lives,
this dire state of affairs which threatens the very survival of indigenous
white Europe, is set to continue until the last white European becomes
extinct.
Posted by A Swain at 10:36 PM on April 7
I love fjordman. He’s one of the writers who got me involved in white nationalism, all of his articles are exhaustive, well researched, and unflinching. It is funny that he is still leery of the title when he has always had the substance. Bravo, my friend! Keep up the voice of Europe, I promise people are listening.
Posted by Diamed at 1:15 AM on April 8
Well is someone going to step up and get this thing going?! How does a
movement like this get started anyway?
I need more community service leadership experience, and this sounds just
excellent, but I don’t know how to start a political movement. I don’t
know if living at ground-zero of the Mexican Invasion would make this a
lot harder, or give me more support.
All I know is that my employer is now pushing for more diversity and
inclusivness, and that my store manager is considering mandatory Spanish
lessons. No word yet on who is going to foot the bill for those lessons.
Posted by Jacqui in AZ at 1:18 AM on April 8
I read this article by the noted Scandanavian blogger Fjordman yesterday on the Brussles Journal site. I have read many of his essays on the impact of the rapid rise of Islamic populations in Europe. I was impressed that he has (finaly) drawn the connection between the rise of Islam in Europe and the mass immigration policies of the evil EU. To me this is a no-brainer. I never understood how someone could be against “radical” Islam in Europe (the term radical is so misleading. There are no moderate muslims) and not connect the obvious dots between this and the traitorous and insane act by the European elites of allowing mass immigration of peoples from a culture that is totaly alien and diabolicaly hostile to the West. This basic disconnect between cause and effect seems to be lost on otherwise intelligent and logical people.
With that said, the idea of a indiginous movement for the peoples of Europe is a great idea. I once asked a left-liberal type why the European peoples in Europe were not seen as indiginous populations. After all, they have inhabited the continent since it was habitable, as noted by the author above. The answers I received was a puzzled look and then the reply: “because they are White”. So yes Fjordman, it IS because you are White.
The European people are indiginous to that continent. They should have the same rights to self preservation as all of the other indiginous people of the world. But they don’t. And it’s because our own insane and hostile elites are determined to destroy all vestiges of Western culture. IF the West somehow survives the coming storm, this historical enigma will be debated for generations. If the West dosen’t survive then there will be no history.
Posted by White Canadian at 2:37 AM on April 8
I have so many reactions to this article I don’t know where to start, so just a few notes:
Even in South Africa at the moment it is impossible to create a movement exclusively for whites. The exact same thing that made Whites the most successful race on earth is the very same thing that now threatens to destroy us, i.e our individualism, or the concept of “every man for himself”. We just cannot stand together.
Our enemies are envious and jealous and would see no logic in what the author is trying to convey.
Secondly, if any one has taken the trouble to read the Bible, you will know that ‘we are the bearers of light’ and that ‘other nations will be blessed through us’ and that ‘we will be persecuted for all eternity’.
Europe has been weakened because of its moral decline and decadance. A return to its Christian roots will have the automatic effect of others not feeling at ease or welcome in our midst. Being ‘nice’ to others and not wanting to hurt their feelings or being scared of being labelled as racist is what got all the white nations on the planet in the situation we now find ourselves in.
However, I wish Fjordman well and totally agree with him. It’s just that to a white African the article has an aura of naivity around it.
Posted by Commando at 3:08 AM on April 8
Based on this evidence, the European Union can hardly be seen as anything other than a criminal organization dedicated to the demographic dispossession and cultural marginalization of the indigenous peoples of an entire continent. Consequently, the EU should be immediately and totally dissolved.
I totally agree. But the only way to defeat the EU is to defeat
liberalism. That’s a difficult endeavour, which will probably take
decades. A long march through the institutions, marxist- style (Gramsci)
is what we need. Do we have the time? It took Marxists just one generation
to achieve total control of Western societies.
Can we work faster?
Posted by Proofreader at 6:41 AM on April 8
Do you hear the people sing?
Singing a song of angry men?
It is the music of a people
Who will not be slaves again!
When the beating of your heart
Echoes the beating of the drums
There is a life about to start
When tomorrow comes!
Will you join in our crusade?
Who will be strong and stand with me?
Posted by at 10:22 AM on April 8
Rarely am I as impressed by an article as I am by this utterly brilliant piece from Fjordman. My modest contribution to solving the problem of the anti-European EU is to point out the following:
They key to Europe is and always has been Germany. As Germany goes, so goes Europe. As someone who talks to folks in Germany regularly, I am happy to report that most INDIGENOUS people there are FED UP with the current, oppressive and confiscatory climate of PC mandated population replacement and “revolution from above,” and are itching for something to be done.
Even many of the “Ossis” I talk to, including former members of the SED, have said that even the DDR did not attack the fundamental “Germannness” of its people the way the BRD/EU combination is doing.
We should face the fact that the multicultural EU’s policy of de-europeanization are backed, ultimately, by the “propositional” USA and its nukes. I say, let the USA attack Iran, but not for the reasons its neo-con wirepullers advance. Letting the neo-con cabal in DC embark on its insane adventures will ultimately EXHAUST and bleed dry the USA, which would not be a bad thing for Europe or even for White people in America, who have been under attack by the USA for DECADES.
The weakening of the USA and its retreat from European affairs must inevitably undermine its neo-con satraps in Germany (of which Merkel is just one eruption), and the hour to administer the coup de grace to the EU will have arrived. This can happen by Germany’s withdrawal from all EU involvement and its conclusion of an alliance based on BILATERAL agreements with RUSSIA, which as things stand would be all to happy to oblige. There is a long tradition and a solid historical precedent for this, if one remembers that friendship with Russia was the cornerstone of the diplomatic and foreign policy advocated by Bismarck.
The end of Marxist-Plutocrat rule in Deutschland is still the best hope of Europeans as a species, and despite over six-decades of “reeducation” of the type advocated by Louis Nizer in his screed “What To Do With Germany,” the Germans are still aware of being GERMAN. I don’t think the British, the French, the Dutch, the Italians or ANYONE ELSE can pull this off. Washington’s Trojan horse in Europe, Poland, certainly won’t like a revival of the Bismarckian Russo-German relationship, but we all have to make sacrifices, don’t we?
We must face the facts: The World Wars and the Germanophobia that fueled them have led to the present predicament of European descended people worldwide. It is in the interest of the Western peoples as a whole to ignore the Germanophobes from now on.
Long live the Berlin-Moscow Axis (or if you will, the Potsdam-St. Petersburg Axis)!
Posted by Bill Cutting at 10:27 AM on April 8
Basically Fjordman has written Bob Whitaker’s Mantra in a form that won’t get him prosecuted by the anti-white authorities of Europe. Anti-racism equals anti-white equals a policy of genocide.
Posted by Simmons at 10:32 AM on April 8
THE values of the weak prevail,
because the strong have taken them over
as devices of leadership. Friedrich Nietzsche
“The values of the weak prevail,” wrote Friedrich Nietzsche, “because
the strong have taken them over as devices of leadership.” This brief and
rather cryptic remark contains virtually all we need to know about why
contemporary movements like multiculturalism, feminism, homosexualism, and
anti-white racism are such powerful trends in modern American and other
Western societies.
Posted by cdbmausa at 10:53 AM on April 8
”Well is someone going to step up and get this thing going?! How does a movement like this get started anyway?”- Jacqui in AZ
Great article. And i would suggest that the linking of existing
cultural & political organisations through conferences, rallies, festivals
etc., would be a fast & easy way to develop such a movement & does avoid
having to start from scratch.
Posted by political correctness is cultural marxism at 12:30 PM on April 8
For Europe to change, it needs to change its attitude towards
America and her policies. I have met so many Europeans here with smug
attitudes who expound the virtues of socialism at every opportunity even
as they reside in this country and reep the rewards of living in a free
society where their efforts are compensated and their voices are still
heard. Until Europe realizes that its their socialist mindset which is
destroying them, things will not change and will indeed become
progessively worse. Taking in and caring for all the riff-raff of the
world doesn’t build a strong and virtuous country. Europe is being ruled
more and more by a third world mob, a trend I see as irreversible. At this
point, I can only hope for a miracle.
Posted by Cari at 12:34 PM on April 8
“The European people are indiginous to that continent. They should have the same rights to self preservation as all of the other indiginous people of the world. But they don’t. “
Is that so? Well, here you go : I hereby declare that white people have the right to self-preservation in all forms and at all levels, as the indigenous people of Europe, and as the rightful heirs of European lands and culture. Also, white people everywhere have the same right to self-preservation and the preservation of their culture, and no law shall be respected which contradicts this declaration or in any way nullifies it effect, as it is a declaration of natural and sacrosanct law that precedes & super-cedes any law made by man, anywhere, at anytime.
There you go, you have the right.
Now, do you have the will to resist those who wish to deny you your most basic right- the right to fight for your life?
Do you have the will to repel the invader as your ancestors did, providing you the possibility to live as you have, and in turn save your progeny from the cruel designs of the invader?
Do you believe you have any right to simply abandon your children to them? Or your neighbor’s children? Do you believe you have any right to abandon the legacy for which your forefathers so nobly strove? To those who do, may you live long, and may the miserable cries of Europe’s children, abandoned to the unspeakable cruelties of the invader, rend you to the core every waking & sleeping moment of your wretched lives.
To those who have the will, march!
I guarantee that the governments which have been stabbing you in the back will be on their knees in short order, when they see millions of determined Europeans march on the seats of power, demanding justice for the real people of the land.
If you have the will.
Again, let him who dreads his enemy’s epithets more than the cries of despair & misery of his own brothers & children- let such as him be damned!
Posted by W.D. at 12:34 PM on April 8
Destroy liberalism and the Frankfurt school of thinking and the west will be saved from the muslim/immigrant invasion!
Posted by AF at 3:57 PM on April 8
The good news is that the Russians are actively promoting higher Russian birth rates. In fact they have billboards along some of their highways promoting lots of children!
Posted by RealityCheck at 4:41 PM on April 8
You create a movement the same way the liberals did. You use their successful movements as a template for yours.
All sorts of ways to get started right now though. Post on forums, blogs and discussion boards all over the Net. Set up your own website and or blog. You can also talk to people via word of mouth.
But I must say, that it shouldn’t be about hate or dislike. Actually I like all peoples. I really do. But as with everything there needs to be boundaries. And one should respect and celebrate their ancestry. That’s what I promote.
Posted by RealityCheck at 4:46 PM on April 8
The fact that the right to defend a native culture in ones own land needs defending is clear display of the perversity of modern political thought. Endless generosity makes a whore out of true generosity, and very often the most generous displays are the giving of what others have worked for to people that have squandered their own inheritence. In the NT parable of the virgins waiting for the bridegroom,.. half came prepared with extra fuel the others took less care, then as time extended these negligent ones asked of the dilligent for their extra fuel, but justice demanded that each reap in accordence to their diligence lest they all fall short. Kindness as I see it should not be liscence for diligent races of man to be enslaved by those that habitualy are not, nor should it mean that white races must mix their more successful genes with others, which is obviously whats behind multiculturalism. What is wrong with letting people prosper according to their own efforts?
Posted by Petrarch at 6:34 PM on April 8
This situation has happened before, except it was the Jews. They became numerous in Europe due to large scale migration during the Dark Ages , which eventually lead to resentment and large-scale extermination. History tends to repeat itself in frightening ways.
Posted by White American at 6:58 PM on April 8
To Howard in Las Vegas,
I am a brother to the Russians for their defense of their culture, identity, and homeland. Indigenous Indians are also brothers to the Russians. We need to all be like Russians. Tell the foreigners to get out of our land and they will go!
Posted by Elrey Jones at 10:33 PM on April 8
While the Russians may have started something significant/symbolic in terms of their behavior/reaction to immigration, I think some posters risk overstating the usefulness of Russia as a model for the rest of the white West to follow. Russia is hardly a paragon of Western virtue; criminality, decadence, irresponsibility, unemployment, and general barbarity are rampant in Russia (yes, among the native Russians), but I’m naturally partial to the West anyway (e.g. England, France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, etc.), and hold a healthy amount of (historically based) skepticism towards the eastern Europeans. I think this difference should not be overlooked or completely disregarded.
Posted by a student at 2:54 PM on April 9
To Bill Cutting,
Being a Germanophile myself, I certainly hope that Deutschland sees much better days to come.
Can you tell us more about why Germany is a good barometer for the rest of Europe. That’s an interesting idea.
Posted by White Dragon at 7:13 PM on April 9
An American friend of mine has proposed that native Europeans should create a European Indigenous People’s Movement. I have hesitated with supporting this because it sounded a bit too extreme.
Extreme? What’s extreme about it?
Americans happen to know something about the subject. Maybe you should
listen to them.
In an age where the global population increases with billions of people in a few decades, it is entirely plausible, indeed likely, that the West could soon become demographically overwhelmed.
“Could” happen? It’s not merely likely, it’s presently HAPPENING right before our eyes. ANybody would be willfully not to see it.
Posted by at 7:59 AM on April 18