How often did we warn them?

Scheming politicians egged on by the votes of racial aliens were warned as far back as the late 1960s. Enoch Powell of the British parliament gave an inspiring speech which warned of “rivers of blood”. Their only answers along with a compliant press has always been Racist, bigot, racial supremist and etc. But have you noticed? The smears have eased off as they now realise the tremendous dangers now facing our very existence as a European Christian nation. Some politicians and others of influence are starting to speak out, especially in Europe.

But is it too late, how do we remove this pestilence and survive? There is only one answer we must do what our forefathers found necessary in the late 1800.

The mind boggling obsession of some which is mainly politicians is that multi racial immigration and the discredited  multicuralism is still worth pursuing.

 

Below is a comment from a British publication – is there anyone who disagrees with the comments?

 


October 2006 edition The PATRIOTIC FORUM (U.K.)

Click on  http://www.patrioticforum.co.uk----------

 

Ever since its inception our movement has constantly tried to highlight the threat posed to white western civilisation by multi-culturalism and multi-racial societies. At times during past decades this has proved to be very difficult, as one western country after another embraced the dubious delights of multi-culturalism and passed insidious "race relations" laws in order to silence those who warned of the dangers. Nowhere was this capitulation to the forces of multi-racialism more sad and surprising than in South Africa, which previously had been viewed as a beacon of sanity and commonsense by white patriots around the globe. Now, more suddenly than perhaps could have been expected, all this seems to be changing. Throughout Europe and Australasia (and in Britain and the Netherlands in particular) mainstream politicians have at last found the strength to speak out about the problems which allowing a sizeable minority of aliens to settle in their lands has caused. To be sure, at present these concerns have only been expressed in relation to the specific Muslim threat - but a start has at least been made, and this should greatly encourage those of us who recognise that the problem is actually far more fundamental. The 9/11 and 7/7 Muslim terrorist attacks against the west woke up many who previously deluded themselves about a make-believe multi-cultural "utopia". Even in spite of fierce opposition to the wars against terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq by Mohammedan immigrants and their pro-multi-racial fellow-travellers, most western leaders (with the sickening exception of the Spanish) stood firm and realised that the Islamic threat was real and had to be confronted at its very heart if western civilisation was to survive. Now, however, it seems as if more and more establishment politicians realise that the threat doesn't only lie from the Muslim countries alone, but is also present within our own borders. Over recent weeks Britain has introduced stronger legislation to detain and deport Islamic extremists; jack straw and other labour politicians have voiced strong opposition to the subjugation of Mohammedan women by the wearing of the veil; and the media has been quite open in specifying that a Muslim taxi-driver refused to carry a blind woman and her guide-dog, and that Muslim mobs had attacked the homes of servicemen in the Windsor area. Merely a year or so ago such developments and reporting would have been unthinkable because of fear of "race relations" legislation and the intimidating effects of "political correctness". It is quite clear therefore that the entire zeitgeist of the western world has radically changed over the past couple of years - even if there are those who for their own sinister reasons choose to deny this. With more effort to alert and inform people of the true dangers posed to our way of life by continuing multi-culturalism then the situation can only improve even more. The days ahead will inspire us.