Impeach officialdom

In conjunction with many other attacks upon our freedoms by politicians who no longer regard themselves as our servants attempts are now being made to restrict our right to trial by Jury. 

 

An Indictment has now been filed against Judge Michael Frederick Adams on the charge of denying John Peter Bauskis the Right to Trial by Jury. This has been done by a citizen of Australia.  

 

Alongside this is yet another attempt to prevent decent concerned citizens from challenging the "two party" political system by upping the ante on payments required to stand as a candidate for parliament. The amount for disclosure of donations has also been increased to $10,000 which will no doubt cover up many corrupt donations.

 

Now that a Judge has to answer for his misdeeds what about someone taking the time to bring past and present politicians before the courts to answer for the crime of disrupting this country by bringing in multitudes of potential enemies, some of whom have already shown their intentions. These politicians who, as recorded in Hansard, have committed a crime against the Australian people by refusing to listen to their concerns and creating a society of antagonistic factions where deaths have already occurred and then covered up by a compliant news media.

 

Could an action such as this become part of the platform of one of the Patriotic parties, surely it would gain votes?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    

NSW SUPREME COURT JUDGE INDICTED BY FIRST GRAND JURY

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2007/03/02 - 2:18am. News | New South Wales | press release

Readers on the strength of the email below to Jim Ball at 2GB.

I spoke for perhaps six minutes on the subject of the first peoples Grand Jury in Australia. Mr Ball had obviously been supplied the google reference to Grand Jury origins way back in Magna Carta. I am pleased to say he assisted me to get the idea across that this is an important watershed in jurisprudence. And without doubt a beacon able to light the way for oppressed peoples in Australia, god willing.

I don't believe I have put any wrong stuff out their.

Cheers Edward James
 

 The following is a copy of the message you sent to Jim Ball - Mid Dawn via 2GB.com

  Comments received: Dear Jim Ball, 2GB. The Australian peoples have for the first time in Australian judicial history, exercised their rights to hold a Grand Jury, and have findings accepted by the registry of the Supreme Court NSW. Inditing a Judge of the Supreme Court. Consider that this 
momentous occasion is still being kept quiet by the paid print media.

 On Tuesday the 27th of February, 2007, in the Registry of the NSW Supreme Court, Queen's Square, Sydney, an Indictment was filed against Michael Frederick Adams on the charge of denying John Peter Bauskis the Right to Trial by Jury....an offence carrying a punishment of "not more than five years imprisonment". Immediately after the filing, the Registrar accepted service of the documents on behalf of Adams.  The Case Number is 11031 of 2007.

 The date and time for Directions is set for Monday the 12th of March, 2007at 9:00 am. when we will demand a date for the empanelling of a Petit Jury. It is anticipated the Defendant will file a Notice of Motion to Dismiss the action...a Notice of Motion which, naturally, must be tried and judged by a Jury.

 Filed were a Summons (which contained the indictment), a sworn 23-page Affidavit, a sworn 2-page Affidavit (to which the "Record of the Grand Jurors Concurring" from Sunday the 18th of February, 2007 was annexed), 
and a thick General Case Management Document (containing 8 Court Transcripts and 2 Judgments).  All have been stamped and filed.

 Yours sincerely,
 John Wilson.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~