In this topsy turvey world where those such as Mandella the terrorists are is revered, where buggery is an alternate life style, where prostitutes are politely interviewed on T.V. as are all manner of deviants those who wish to preserve the lifestyle that many died for are smeared as bigots, racial supremists and whatever else they can dream up to silence us.

 

Mandella was a terrorist which makes those prime ministers of ours and others who supported him and the overthrow of civilised rule guilty of supporting terrorism.

Below is an account taken from a newsletter from the Sprinkbok club which can be found at http://www.netcomuk.co.uk/~springbk/springbk.html

---------------------------------------------

The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them -- except force. 
-- John "Birdman" Bryant
John@thebirdman.org

 

---

A Melbourne man has written the following most succinct letter to The Observer expressing his disgust at the recent totally ignorant pronouncements made by David Cameron in relation to South African terrorists :-

LETTER TO THE OBSERVER (U.K.)
Dear Sir,
 
It is seldom that one gets the chance to see short-sighted political
opportunism on the scale recently exhibited by the Tory leader David Cameron.
 
In order to try and boost his international image he decided to hitch a ride
on Nelson Mandela's coat tails. He managed to get the necessary photo shoot
last week and reckoned it afforded a great opportunity to distance himself
from his predecessor, Lady Thatcher, who used to refer to Mandela's ANC as
"terrorists". David Cameron therefore quickly went on record to claim that
Thatcher's Tories got it plainly "wrong" at the time.

Now regardless of how important this photo-op was for Mr Cameron, it is
interesting that he should decide to open a polemic on the definition of
"terrorism" in the same month a major terrorist plot had ostensibly been
foiled in his own country. Not only that, but his country is currently
engaged in a "War on Terror" as the major ally of the United States in the
biggest war currently raging.

Most observers would however agree that one man's "terrorist" is another
man's "freedom fighter", whether it be Mandela, Osama bin Laden, Bobby Sands
or Francisco Garmendia. Now if we desired to cut through all the
politically-correct posturing and associated sound-bites, we would need to
consult the actual dictionary meaning of the word "terrorist". As an Oxford
old boy Cameron should be happy with the Oxford Dictionary's definition
which defines a "terrorist" as :  "a person who uses violence and
intimidation in the pursuit of political aims".

Now whichever way you look at it, this is pretty much what the ANC did
during the Thatcher years. I don't know what Cameron did at his Eton school
on 20 May 1983, but on that day the ANC blew up 18 civilians through a car
bomb explosion in Pretoria. Last year on 7 July a "terrorist" blew up 13
civilians on a bus at Tavistock Place, London. Would David Cameron be able
to connect these dots - or will he, 20 years down the line after a photo
opportunity with an aging Osama bin Laden, hail him too as "one of the
greatest men alive" before criticizing Blair for calling al-Qa'eda
"terrorists"? How will we ever eradicate this scourge while the likes of
Cameron insist on making their contemptible efforts worthwhile?

For let us not fool ourselves. The world is forever condemning "terrorism"
on the one hand while rewarding it on the other. Sinn Fein would never have
been part of any Belfast Agreement if it wasn't for the IRA's long-standing
campaign of blowing up civilians all over the UK, and how prominent would
the ANC have been if it wasn't for an "armed struggle" that amounted to
little more than ambushing policemen and blowing up civilians in public
places? Who would've known about ETA and how many people would have shown
any sympathy for the "Palestinian cause" if it did not get advertised
through decades of terror inspiring bloodshed?

If the British were ever going to be foolish enough to elect a terror
apologist of Cameron's ilk to high office, they can rest assured that
further "freedom fighter" attacks like those of 7/7 are going to be visited
upon them with ever more regularity. 

Yours respectfully,

name deleted
Melbourne

 

---