29th December 2004
Sandringham Estate, in north Norfolk
- not a centre of multiculturalism!
We all saw
the nauseating speech given by the Queen on Christmas Day. With its
facile rhetoric lecturing us about how indigenous working class white
people living in run down council estates surrounded by Muslims and
asylum seekers should be celebrating multiculturalism and the wonderful
'diversity' around them it could have come straight from the spinmasters
of the New Labour - and it most probably did. Windsor, Balmoral and
Sandringham are not known as multi-cultural areas of Britain, so the
fact the Monarch knows so much from her personal experience about this
wonderful diversity we should all be celebrating in Britain, comes
as something of a puzzle.
Could the fact that Prince Harry has mysteriously managed to escape
a caution for punching a press photographer in the face on October
31st 2004 after leaving a London nightclub, have anything to do with
his grandmother’s
lecture to us all on race relations in Britain? A Crown Prosecution Service
lawyer had recommended that Prince Harry receive a caution for the assault
on the photographer, but then had his decision overturned by an unknown
senior CPS official who then said 'It is not in the Public Interest for
the caution to be issued'.
Yob culture
And there was Tony Blair preaching, as usual, only a few weeks ago
about how the 'drunken Yob Culture' prevalent amongst British youth
needs to be stamped on by the law. It seems that only working class
yobs will be criminalised under his plans whilst the nobility will
walk away with no conviction. The fact that Tony Blair’s 16-year-old
son Euan had also been arrested for being drunk and incapable in
Leicester Square, in London's West End in July 2000 and subsequently
not charged also seems to suggest that it is both the scions of the
nobility and the New Labour elite who are apt not to be charged for
their loutish behaviour.
Possible explanation?
Could the fact that the caution which would have prevented Prince Harry
from joining the army and going to Sandhurst possibly be the reason why
the Queen gave her 'New Labour Christmas Message' to the British people.
The Police caution for Prince Harry would normally have been issued as
a matter of routine. The fact this caution was passed to senior lawyers
who overruled the advice of the previous CPS lawyer suggests political
interference in the process.
The Attorney General is in overall charge of the Crown Prosecution Service
and the Department of Public Prosecutions.
Lord Goldsmith QC was appointed by Tony Blair on 11 June 2001 as Her
Majesty's Attorney General.
Attorney General- his links and responsibilities
The Attorney General, assisted by the Solicitor General, is the chief
legal adviser to the Government. The Attorney General has overall responsibility
for the Treasury Solicitors' Department, superintends the Director of
Public Prosecution as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the
Director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Director of Public
Prosecutions in Northern Ireland. The Law Officers answer for these Departments
in Parliament. The Attorney General has public interest functions in
which his responsibility is as guardian of the public interest.
The Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, is also a Labour Party member!
____________________________________
Labour
Regime raid another BNP home
30th December 2004
Repression
in Britain-
Police used against a political opposition party
The New Labour regime conducted another Police raid
on the family home of a former BNP official this morning, seizing a computer
and paperwork.
The raid on the family home of John Brayshaw occurred this morning (Thursday
30th) with four uniformed officers from North Yorkshire Police and one
Special Branch detective in attendance.
John himself was neither questioned, arrested or detained. There is no
suggestion that the Police plan to make any charges against him or any
knowledge why this particular raid took place.
Old paperwork
The paperwork removed relates solely to the Central Accounting Unit of
the BNP. This is an extraordinary development and seems to serve no obvious
purpose regarding the accounts of the Party.
First of all, Mr. Brayshaw our former treasurer ceased to act in that
capacity in June 2004 when the task of National Treasurer was taken over
by John Walker. Thus the material seized by the Police is significantly
out of date and relates to previous financial years. Yesterday John Walker
submitted the full Central Accounting Unit Accounts to the Electoral
Commission (EC) for the last financial year. This follows an agreed extension
to the deadline as a result of a delay in acquiring the services of an
independent qualified accountant prepared to work on our behalf to audit
the accounts. So the raid was not designed to delay our accounts submission
and cause the Party to fall foul of the EC regulations. If the State
wanted to see our accounts, instead of disrupting the family home of
John Brayshaw and wasting Police time, an examination of the submitted
and audited accounts would have been a much simpler task.
Furthermore, the Electoral Commission denies any involvement in the raid.
When National Treasurer, John Walker contacted the EC this afternoon,
he was told by the Compliance Officer, Robert Sprent, that the EC had
no idea why the Police should be interested in such paperwork and denied
that the EC had initiated the raid. The BNP extends its support and appreciation
to John Brayshaw and sends his family, who were deeply upset by the violation
of their private home, a happy and wish-fulfilled New Year.
Desperate measures
The real reason for the raid is, we believe, a reaction from a very
worried Labour Regime. The Police have confirmed to several senior
BNP officials that they have received instructions "from the very top" to
deal with the BNP. There is no allegation or even suggestion that
the Party's financial affairs are nothing other than full, transparent
and correct.
This raid is another scare tactic by an increasingly desparate New Labour
regime, designed to harass, obfuscate and inhibit the BNP from mounting
an effective election campaign in the New Year. Pollsters are already
predicting a large swing to the Lib-Dems away from Labour by a block
vote of Muslims, who continue to be disgusted by Labour's involvement
in Iraq. A large core of voters in white working class areas of British
cities are expected to cast their mark against a BNP candidate; a move
which while not leading to any BNP MPs being returned to Westminster
could unseat several Labour MPs, even Cabinet Ministers.
Two benefits for New Labour
So the attack
on the infrastructure of the BNP serves two purposes; first it scares
off potential candidates, activists and donors in a bid to weaken our
Election campaign. In addition it sends out a message that New Labour
is prepared to be tough with those "nasty
people" in the BNP, thus appeasing the Muslim voters.
Bring it on Mr. Blair!
Blair and his new Home Secretary, the former Communist Party member,
Charles Clarke are doing their best to stiffle the opposition to their
destructive plans for Britain, but the people who make up the BNP support
base are the descendants of the Saxon warriors, the Pictish axe wielders
and the Norman knights. We are the descendants of those millions of sailors
and soldiers whose bodies lie in every ocean and in every continent.
We have a backbone and a steely resolve to win back our country from
the wreckers, the paedophiles and the corrupt that infest Whitehall and
Westminster.
Enemy of all that is decent
The New Labour regime is the enemy of all decent hard working Britons.
It bleeds us all through obscene levels of taxation to pay for a burdensome
political class. It corrupts the minds of our children by politically
correct teaching and allowing the scourge of drugs to be present in the
playgrounds and schoolrooms of the country. It destroys the communities
of our land by allowing crime to terrorise the vulnerable, punishing
the hard-working, the pensioners and the weak who are victims of crime.
It brutally suppresses its opponents in a tyrannical manner. But New
Labour should remember that tyrants have been overthrown throughout Britain's
history. The names of Blair, Clarke and Dobson may well be others to
soon add to that list.
________________________________________________________________________
Why
we must be aware of Islam
MORE PEOPLE
WORSHIP in Britain's mosques at Friday prayers than at the combined
churches of England, Scotland and Wales for the traditional Sunday
service.
Those who
attend on Friday are male and in the main young, while those attending
on Sunday are generally much older and predominantly female. This means that the
future of Islamic worship in Britain is in the ascendancy with its
followers able to propagate their religion amongst the population, while
Christianity is on the wane, with our churches closing down as congregations
gradually die off.
A great change in the balance of
religious power in Britain is taking place and it is vital that the British
people are aware of this development.
There should be a lively discussion on the rise of Islam
in Britain, not a stony silence imposed on public debate by draconian
new laws.
The growth of Islam in Britain is not just
from within the Muslim communities already here. It grows further each
day through immigration and asylum.
In countries where Islam is the dominant religion,
the law of the land is influenced by Islamic fundamental beliefs. While
this 'Sharia Law' might be welcomed by a majority Muslim population,
it would certainly raise concern amongst people in most western countries.
It is in
the best interests of the British people that there is no further growth
of Islam here. To explain this stance, the pages of Freedom each month
will cover issues concerning Islamic expansion in Britain,
thus enabling our readers to make up their own minds on this most contentious
of issues.
|