And in the USA - will there be an uprising?
USA is expected to link with Canada and Mexico shortly which of course is a furthering of the aim of the Globalists. Can you imagine all those Mexicans flooding into USA and the consequences that will have on USA citizens?
In the USSR an uprising took place and threw off the yoke of Communism. Will a similar situation arise in USA?, surely it would be easier for there are no Commissars in each block keeping a watchful eye on the residents.
Forwarding on:-
********************************************************************************************************
FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE REVIEW. JPW
I checked around, but couldn't find any source for this article besides the Hal Turner show. Link at the end of article. Saw some of his stuff and no red flags. frankly, after all my research, this stuff fits right in.
One forum responder said that they wouldn't have had time to discuss all that's below. Probably true. But this account may be more to the point. They were being told, not discussing the economic issue.
I'm sure we'll hear more in the next few days. It's still early enough for anyone holding a 401k or other such things or any stock, to "relieve" yourself from those very vulnerable vehicles. If the dollar gets de-monetized, they say, then those havens will be worthless, as will big piles of cash. Adopting the Amero could well bring an exchange rate of 2 cents on the dollar. Fifty bucks for one Amero. Loaf of bread, 3 Ameros?
The article at the end is just the AP report of the meeting.
SPECIAL "CLOSED SESSION" OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISCUSSED A LOT MORE THAN THE PENDING SECURITY SURVEILLANCE PROVISIONS
LAST NIGHTS SESSION WAS ONLY THE FOURTH TIME IN 176 YEARS THAT CONGRESS CLOSED ITS DOORS TO THE PUBLIC
Word has begun leaking from last nights special, closed-door session of the United States House of Representatives.
Not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they were also bluntly warned about:
The imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008,
the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009,
the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse,
advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government,
The detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA,
the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses,
the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest
the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool),
the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon.
Members of Congress were FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed and ABC News via WCPO web site at the link below CONFIRMS congress members were FORBIDDEN to talk about it!
Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country, they have begun leaking info. More details coming later today and over the weekend. SPREAD THE WORD!!!House Goes Behind Closed Doors To Debate Surveillance Bill
Last Update: 3/14 1:34 am
Related Links
Web produced by: Neil Relyea
CAPITOL HILL (AP) -- The House has held a closed session for the first time in 25 years, discussing a hotly contested surveillance bill.
Republicans had requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping measure.
The bill is opposed by the White House and most Republicans in Congress.
Lawmakers were forbidden to disclose what was said during the hour-long late-night session.
The extent to which minds were changed, if at all, should be more clear Friday, when the House is expected to openly debate and then vote on the bill.
President Bush has vowed to veto the surveillance measure, saying it would undermine the nation's security.
Bush opposes it in part because it wouldn't provide retroactive legal immunity for telecom companies that may have helped the government eavesdrop on their customers without court permission after the 9/11 terror attacks.
Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.