THE "STOLEN" GENERATION
Adapted from an article by Jack Ford
IS THERE A SINISTER MOVEMENT BEHIND THIS AGENDA?
Why did Prime Minister ‘cRudd apologise for “stolen” off white children when he knew perfectly well that these children were rescued while others were brought to the outback missions by their mothers for fear of violence or rape by the tribe. In some cases the mothers were not allowed back into the tribe unless they got rid of the child and if unable to take it to a mission the child in some cases had their skulls crushed by the mother.
The Prime Minister should hide his face in shame at the political chicanery he resorted to in order to gain politically from the Aboriginal vote. There is much more to this article but too long to reproduce here.
Fellow Australians you must remember this political exploitation and vote against the Rudd Labor party.
If you wish to express your disgust with the Prime Minister please click on the following link http://www.pm.gov.au/contact/index.cfm
********************************************************************************************************
The Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, recently made a speech in Federal Parliament in which he said "sorry" to Australia's Aborigines for the "stolen generation". This was well reported in the mass-media.
Mr Rudd was not only deliberately lying but made this apology on behalf of all Australians. However Mr. Rudd, and all politicians, are elected to carry out the `will' of the Australian people. Nowhere have the Australian people, as a whole, indicated that they wanted to say "sorry" to the Aborigines. If Mr. Rudd was in doubt about the `will' of the people on this matter, he should have found out through a referendum. He did not.
Mr. Rudd is in breach of his duty to the Australian people, and has acted illegally.
During Mr. Rudd's "sorry speech", school children were forced to watch the speech on television. The Aboriginal flag was raised in school ceremonies. School children were made to read stories about Aboriginal culture and traditions and were urged to "celebrate" Aboriginal culture.
As Herald Sun Columnist, Andrew Bolt points out, this is not teaching, this is --indoctrination". He likens it to Communist propaganda. (Herald Sun, 1312/08).
Were part-white Aboriginal children brutally "stolen" from their Aboriginal homes during the mid 1900s?
Television Channel 9's "Sunday" program, on 10/8/97, reported that because these children had white fathers, they and their Aboriginal mothers were denied Aboriginal Tribal rights and laws.
These children were beaten by male adult Aborigines. The mothers often killed the children by hitting them on the head with a rock. Or they simply let them perish.
The report stated that one part-white, part-Aboriginal woman today stated that if she had been left with her Aboriginal family she would be sitting by the creek getting drunk and paid for by Australian taxpayers.
Quite a few said they were much "better off" today because they were "taken". That is looked after by the missionaries who adopted some out to caring people.
Half caste kids would turn up at missions with spear marks and signs of horrific beltings. Babies were occasionally abandoned and young children left to fend for themselves. "Yella fellas" could find themselves in no-mans land. (One Voice, Many Issue, by Scott Balson. PO Box 11. Mr CrosbyNews, Qld. 4306).
Many of the most outspoken Aboriginals of today have their "stolen generation" upbringing to thank for their high education and ability to now use "white man's law" against him. (Ibid).
Could this treatment of part-white Aborigines be classed as "racist"?
Hansard, 2/6/07, records the speech by Graeme Campbell (MHR for Kalgoorlie, W.A., and leader of the Australia First political Party), in which he comments on Sir Ronald Wilson's report on Aborigines: Bringing Them Home.
Graeme Campbell's electorate covered a vast area of W.A. and he had extensive practical dealings with Aborigines, more than any other politician, or perhaps any other white person in Australia. Extracts from his speech follow:
There were many cases where people did not respond (give evidence to Sir Ronald Wilson - editor's comment) because they knew it was a fact of being made Wards of the State that saved their lives.
Besides being very selective, Sir Ronald Wilson's report is fatally flawed in other ways. He says it is not an intellectual report; it is from the heart. That means, of course, it is not bound by fact.
I remember the words of Isabella Lynott, who is now 95 years old. She, along with her sister, were the first children taken to Beagle Bay, a Catholic mission, in 1909. Isabella's father was white and when he died her mother implored the local Police Officer to take her children as they would otherwise surely die. Isabella remembers Beagle Bay very warmly.
She said: "The nuns were very good to us. They gave us clean clothes, taught us to read and write and to play musical instruments. They taught us to sew and to dance."
She had only gratitude for her deliverance.
Another hero of mine is Pearl Hamaguchi, a woman, who, being an Aboriginal-Asian, endured a far harder life than white half-caste children. Being half Asian, she was not considered worth saving, although she was institutionalised for a short time later.
Both she, her husband, her family, are highly respected members of the community. Her comment to me recently was that she always thought that, we, the Gudea, were a bit silly, but, with Mabo, native title, she now thinks we are far more stupid than even she had imagined. Pearl Hamaguchi is an inspiration to me and a great role model for the whole of society.
I have spoken to Police Officers who have told me that, where children were being looked after, they did not enforce their removal. Many of the children were taken for their own protection.
There were cases where Aboriginal custodial fathers would encourage their young, lighter coloured girls into prostitution. I wonder what the ranks of the politically correct would have had the government of the day do under those circumstances. In many cases, half-caste children were simply not wanted by the tribe, regardless of how the mother felt.
The real tragedy and shame is that, because of all this emotional nonsense, there are many Aboriginal children today who should be made Wards of the State, and the authorities know that their failure to do so will inevitably lead to their death. They are entitled to the protection of the State but are denied it because of political correctness.
In his report. Betraying The Victims - The "Stolen Generations" Report, Feb. 1998 (published by the Institute of Public Affairs), anthropologist, Ron Brunton, describes (Sir Ronald Wilson's Report, Bringing Them Home), as one of the most intellectually and morally irresponsible official documents produced in recent years.
Brunton states that even the most critical observers of Australia's past would probably still concede that there were occasions when a `refusal' to separate an Aboriginal child from his or her family would have led to the child's serious injury or death.
There is reason to believe that many lives were saved because these children were "taken': Perhaps the "stolen "generation "should be called the "rescued" generation?
But with the Prime Minister having now apologised for the "stolen" generation, massive compensation claims are expected, which will have to be paid for by the taxpayers.
Many Aboriginal and part-Aboriginal lives were also saved when white Australians stopped the Japanese advance on Australia in World War 2. This includes Aborigines alive today and those alive after WW2. Had the Japanese conquered Australia they would have killed every single Aborigine.
Former Communist, the late Geoff McDonald, in his book: Red Over Black - Behind the Aboriginal Land Rights (Heritage Book Service, GPO Box 1052, Melbourne, Vic., 3001), states: "In the phoney debate about Aboriginal land rights", it is generally overlooked that irrespective of what happened in the past, there would be no debate at all if young white Australians had not died on the Kokoda Trail and other parts of South-East Asia in stemming the Japanese assault during the Pacific War.
"A Japanese victory would have eliminated any Aboriginal problem - by the simple process of liquidating the Aborigines? By their sacrifices white Australians have as much right to be in Australia as the Aborigines."
Graeme Campbell has stated that respected Aboriginal leader, Billy King, said that had the Japanese conquered our nation they would have gotten rid of all Aborigines. Mr. King said that it was overwhelmingly white Australians who fought, and died, fighting for everyone's freedom. (Australia First Party's Newsletter, Breakthrough, March, 1998).
Whilst some Aborigines fought in WW2, it is clear that without the sacrifices of white Australians, the Japanese would have killed all Aborigines. Aborigines and part-Aborigines are alive today because of our sacrifices.
Has the Aboriginal community "thanked" white Australia for this? We are waiting!
Let us now have a brief look at Aboriginal "culture", a censored version of which our schoolchildren are being indoctrinated in. These children are being lied to about the "romantic" culture of the noble Aborigines.
The Aborigines were cannibals and had a long history of this. There are many books to prove this, some of which are listed below. You will recall the picture of the young Aboriginal women at the start of this article, and Daisy Bates' comment about them eating their own babies. Daisy Bates lived among the Aborigines for many years and had only their welfare at heart.
Aborigines ate their babies, children, wives, brothers and sisters. The most appalling orgies of cannibalism occurred. Chinese people were particularly favoured because the Chinese diet was predominantly rice. The Aborigines did not have deep-freeze units so they hung the Chinese up by their pig-tails for several days until they were ready to kill and eat them. Or, they broke their legs so they could not run away.
Books that document Aboriginal cannibalism include: Daisy Bates - Great White Queen of the Never Never, by Elizabeth Salter; Angus & Robertson. (Professor) Manning Clark, in the History of Australia. Cape York: The Savage Frontier, by R. Liddell; public Libraries. Among Cannibals: Account of Four Years Travel in Australia and of Camp Life with the Aborigines of Queensland, by C. Lumholtz; Murray, London. More Bloody Wags, by Sandy Thorne, (who has lived in the outback all her life) PO Box 1011, Lightning Ridge, NSW, 2834. This History is Really Bunk, by P. Raffaele; referred to in The Australian Newspaper, 30/10/96. River of Gold: The Story of the Palmer River Gold Rush, by Hector Holthouse; Angus & Robertson. Cannibalism and Human Sacrifice, by G. Hogg; Robert Hale, London. The Passing of the Aborigines: A Lifetime Spent Among the Natives of Australia, by Daisy Bates; John Murray, London.